Cases 21 - 30 of 2,647
Brewer v. Crabtree et al
as 6:2024cv00396
Petitioner:
Stephen D Brewer
Respondent:
Chadwick Crabtree and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Watkins v. Morgan et al
as 5:2024cv00394
Petitioner:
Jessie James Watkins
Respondent:
Phyllis Morgan and Attorney General of the State of Alabama, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
State of Alabama v. Hammond
as 1:2024cv00195
Plaintiff:
State of Alabama
Defendant:
Hammond Ketavious Javon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Linker v. State of Alabama
as 1:2024cv00087
Plaintiff:
Linker Christopher Ryan and Christopher Ryan Linker
Defendant:
State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Swint v. Williams et al (INMATE 4)
as 2:2024cv00184
Plaintiff:
Darryl Swint
Defendant:
Karen Williams and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Crawford v. The State of Alabama et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2024cv00177
Plaintiff:
Jhamal Dwayne Crawford
Defendant:
The State of Alabama and Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Berger v. Skully et al
as 1:2024cv00076
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Berger
Defendant:
William E. Skully, Jr, J. Dean, Michele M. Thomason and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
McCreary v. State of Alabama
as 1:2024cv00079
Petitioner:
Roger Lee McCreary
Respondent:
State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
State of Alabama et al v. Durham
as 2:2024mc00280
Plaintiff:
State of Alabama and Alabama Department of Corrections
Defendant:
Gregory Durham
Boone v. Mack
as 1:2024cv00067
Petitioner:
George Boone, Jr.
Respondent:
State Of Alabama and Huey Hoss Mack
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
