Cases 21 - 30 of 112
Miller v. State of GA et al
as 1:2021cv02487
Petitioner:
William H. Miller
Respondent:
Hart County and State of GA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Bruce Ward v. ARVM 5 LLC et al
as 1:2021cv02397
Defendant:
McCalla Raymer Leibert Pierce, LLC, Select Portfolio Servicing Inc., Chowdhury Mohammed Z and others
Plaintiff:
Jonathan Frederick Bruce Ward, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv01693
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 pr
Chergi v. State of GA
as 1:2021cv00426
Petitioner:
Paul Chergi
Respondent:
State of GA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Brackett v. City of McCaysville, State of GA
as 2:2020cv00178
Plaintiff:
William Brackett
Defendant:
City of McCaysville, State of GA
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Jordan v. State of GA et al
as 5:2020cv00076
Defendant:
FNU Coley, FNU Clemens, Medical Dept at Coffee Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley H. Jordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lee Perry v. Wayne Christian, et al
as 20-20277
Defendant / Appellee:
AMERICAN PETROLEUM INSTITUTE, MARATHON OIL COMPANY, Lee Tillman, CEO, RYAN LANCE, Ryan M. Lance and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEE PERRY
Jordan v. State of GA et al
as 1:2020cv02255
Defendant:
Officer John Doe 2, City of Atlanta, State of GA and others
Plaintiff:
Bradley H. Jordan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jordan v. State of Ga. et al
as 4:2020cv00121
Plaintiff:
Bradley Hardy Jordan
Defendant:
Officer Pyior, State of Ga. and Sheriff Mitch Rolsten
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fore River Res Against Com Sta, et al v. FERC
as 20-1458
Interested Party:
EVERSOURCE ENERGY, STOP THE ALGONQUIN PIPELINE EXPANSION, CHRISTOPHER WILSON and others
Petitioner:
REBECCA HAUGH, District One Town Councilor, QUINCY, MA, FORE RIVER RESIDENTS AGAINST THE COMPRESSOR STATION (FRRACS) and others
Respondent:
FEDERAL ENERGY REGULATORY COMMISSION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
