Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 39
State of Mississippi Ex Rel. et al v. Rinehart et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv00077
Plaintiff: State of Mississippi Ex Rel. , Steely Danielle Whitaker , Daniel Ryan Bonds and others
Defendant: George Charles Rinehart, Alcorn County and RLI Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
State of Mississippi v. Entergy Mississippi, Inc., et al
as 15-90011
Plaintiff - Petitioner: STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, ex rel, Jim Hood, Attorney General for the State of Mississippi
Defendant - Respondent: ENTERGY MISSISSIPPI, INCORPORATED, ENTERGY CORPORATION, ENTERGY SERVICES, INCORPORATED and others
In re: State of Mississippi
as 15-60225
Petitioner: In re: STATE OF MISSISSIPPI, ex rel, Jim Hood, Attorney General for the State of Mississippi
Defendant - Respondent: ENTERGY MISSISSIPPI, INCORPORATED, ENTERGY CORPORATION, ENTERGY SERVICES, INCORPORATED and others
In re: Fresenius Granuflo/Natu
as 15-1212
Plaintiff / Appellee: CLARENCE L. DUBOSE, individually and as Personal Representative of the estate of Clarence Lee Dubose, BETTYE B. ALEXANDER, AUSTIN P. JETER and others
Plaintiff: KIRK M. PRATT, EOLINE L. STOUDAMIRE, LINDA MCDOWELL and others
Plaintiff / Appellant: STATE OF LOUISIANA, ex rel. James D. "Buddy" Caldwell, Attorney General
Defendant / Appellee: FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE NORTH AMERICA, INC., FRESENIUS USA, INC., FRESENIUS USA MARKETING, INC. and others
Defendant: WALTER L. WEISMAN
In re: Fresenius Granuflo/Natu
as 15-1212
Plaintiff - Appellee: CLARENCE L. DUBOSE, individually and as Personal Representative of the estate of Clarence Lee Dubose, BETTYE B. ALEXANDER, AUSTIN P. JETER and others
Plaintiff: KIRK M. PRATT, EOLINE L. STOUDAMIRE, LINDA MCDOWELL and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: STATE OF LOUISIANA, ex rel. James D. "Buddy" Caldwell, Attorney General
Defendant - Appellee: FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE NORTH AMERICA, INC., FRESENIUS USA, INC., FRESENIUS USA MARKETING, INC. and others
Defendant: WALTER L. WEISMAN
In re: Fresenius Granuflo/Natu
as 15-1211
Plaintiff - Appellee: CLARENCE L. DUBOSE, individually and as Personal Representative of the estate of Clarence Lee Dubose, BETTYE B. ALEXANDER, AUSTIN P. JETER and others
Plaintiff: KIRK M. PRATT, EOLINE L. STOUDAMIRE, LINDA MCDOWELL and others
Plaintiff - Appellant: JIM HOOD, Attorney General of the State of Mississippi, ex rel. The State of Mississippi
Defendant - Appellee: FRESENIUS MEDICAL CARE NORTH AMERICA, INC., FRESENIUS USA, INC., FRESENIUS USA MARKETING, INC. and others
Defendant: WALTER L. WEISMAN
Noatex Corporation v. King Construction of Houston, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 14-60397
Plaintiff - Appellant: NOATEX CORPORATION, a California Corporation
Defendant - Appellee: KING CONSTRUCTION OF HOUSTON, L.L.C., A Mississippi limited liability company and CARL KING
Intervenor - Appellee: JAMES M. HOOD, III, Mississippi Attorney General, State of Mississippi, ex rel
Jim Hood, et al v. JP Morgan Chase & Company, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-60686
Plaintiff - Appellant: JIM HOOD, Attorney General of the State of Mississippi, ex rel. The State of Mississippi and STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
Defendant - Appellee: JP MORGAN CHASE & COMPANY, CHASE BANK USA, N.A., HSBC BANK NEVADA, N.A. and others
Jim Hood, et al v. JP Morgan Chase & Company, et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 13-60687
Plaintiff - Appellant: JIM HOOD, Attorney General of the State of Mississippi, ex rel. The State of Mississippi and STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
Defendant - Appellee: JP MORGAN CHASE & COMPANY, CHASE BANK USA, N.A., HSBC BANK NEVADA, N.A. and others
Jim Hood, et al v. JP Morgan Chase & Company, et al
as 13-90046
Plaintiff - Petitioner: JIM HOOD, Attorney General of the State of Mississippi, ex rel. The State of Mississippi and STATE OF MISSISSIPPI
Defendant - Respondent: JP MORGAN CHASE & COMPANY, CHASE BANK USA, N.A., HSBC BANK NEVADA, N.A. and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?