Cases 21 - 30 of 52
Rodriguez v. Parker et al
as 1:2015cv00181
Plaintiff:
Elizabeth Rodriguez
Defendant:
Stan Parker, Marc Thomas and Charlotte Stovall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv01206
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stovall v. Director TDCJ-CID
as 4:2014cv00793
Petitioner:
Victor Stovall
Respondent:
Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Alfa Laval Inc. v. Flowtrend, Inc. et al
as 4:2014cv02597
Plaintiff:
Alfa Laval Inc.
Defendant:
Flowtrend, Inc. , Jan Hansen , Steven Stovall and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Culpepper v. McCandless et al
as 6:2014cv00583
Plaintiff:
William D Culpepper
Defendant:
Allan D McCandless, Charles C. Bailey, Jimmy L White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Culpepper v. McCandless et al
as 2:2014cv00736
Plaintiff:
William D Culpepper
Defendant:
Allan D McCandless, Charles C. Bailey, Jimmy L White and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stovall et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics Inc et al
as 3:2014cv01611
Plaintiff:
William Stovall and Bonnie Stovall
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics Inc , DePuy Products Inc , DePuy International Limited and others
Pecial_master:
Special Master
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Stovall v. USA
as 4:2014cv00141
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Brenson Stovall
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Stovall v. Flores et al
as 5:2013cv00754
Defendant:
Officer John Doe, Flores and William Stephens
Plaintiff:
Frank Morris Stovall
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
King et al v. Fidelity National Insurance Company et al
as 3:2013cv03234
Plaintiff:
Krystal D King and Stovall & Associates
Defendant:
Fidelity National Insurance Company , Fidelity National Indemnity Insurance Company , John Pereira and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
