Cases 21 - 30 of 111
Ramdeo v. Lyn et al
as 5:2022hc02013
Petitioner:
Sonny Austin Ramdeo
Respondent:
Tamara S. Lyn, Warden Stephen Spaulding, Nicole C. English and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Garcia v. Lyn et al
as 5:2022hc02021
Petitioner:
Eleonel Castrejon Garcia
Respondent:
Warden Tamara S. Lyn and United States Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Wall v. Scarantino et al
as 5:2022hc02009
Petitioner:
Philip Wall
Respondent:
Warden T. Scarantino, Warden Tamara S. Lyn and Warden Melinda King
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Nolen v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 1:2022cv00022
Plaintiff:
Tamara Nolen
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Bishop v. Funderburk et al
as 3:2021cv00679
Plaintiff:
Dan Bishop
Defendant:
Amy L Funderburk, Paul Newby, Robin Hudson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CRISCO v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2022cv00038
Plaintiff:
TAMARA CRISCO
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Reed v. Lyn et al
as 5:2021hc02254
Petitioner:
Joseph Reed
Respondent:
Tamara S. Lyn and United States Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Syed Md v. Scarantino et al
as 5:2021hc02250
Petitioner:
Ghy Asuddin Syed Md
Respondent:
Warden T. Scarantino, Tamara S. Lyn, Melinda King and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
STIREWALT v. KIJAKAZI
as 1:2021cv00816
Plaintiff:
TAMARA STIREWALT
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Interested Party:
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206
Lytle v. Lyn
as 5:2021hc02190
Petitioner:
Robert Larry Lytle
Respondent:
Tamara S. Lyn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
