Cases 21 - 30 of 756
SIDERIAS v. KAJAKAZI
as 5:2023cv03002
Plaintiff:
Tammy Lee Siderias
Defendant:
KILOLO KAJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Siderias v. KAJAKAZI
as 5:2023cv03003
Plaintiff:
Tammy Lee Siderias
Defendant:
KILOLO KAJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
GRIBSCHAW v. HARRY et al
as 2:2023cv02987
Plaintiff:
DAVID GRIBSCHAW
Defendant:
LAUREL HARRY, TAMMY FERGUSON, ANN VERYYALA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROSA-DIAZ v. LITTLE et al
as 2:2023cv02971
Plaintiff:
GABRIEL ROSA-DIAZ
Defendant:
GEORGE LITTLE, LAUREL HARRY, TAMMY FERGUSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nunez, Jr. v. Harry et al
as 1:2023cv01171
Plaintiff:
Fernando Nunez, Jr.
Defendant:
Dr. Laurel R. Harry, Michael Wenerowicz, Tammy Ferguson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv01184
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
LEAPHART v. LITTLE et al
as 2:2023cv01062
Plaintiff:
HAROLD E. LEAPHART
Defendant:
GEORGE LITTLE, LAUREL HARRY, TABB BICKELL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
ROSARIO v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2023cv00966
Plaintiff:
DAVID ROSARIO
Defendant:
FORMER SECRETARY JOHN WETZEL, SECRETARY, DR. LAUREL HARRY, DEPUTY SECRETARY TAMMY FERGUSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
MOODY v. HARRY et al
as 3:2023cv00875
Plaintiff:
Brandon Moody
Defendant:
Laurel Harry, George Little, Tabb Bickle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
EDMOND v. KIJAKAZI
as 5:2023cv01841
Plaintiff:
TAMMY EDMOND
Defendant:
KILOLO KIJAKAZI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
