Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 306
Bad River Band of Lake Superior Tribe of Chippewa v. Naomi Tillison, et al
as 23-2467
Plaintiff / Appellant: BAD RIVER BAND OF LAKE SUPERIOR TRIBE OF CHIPPEWA INDIANS OF THE BAD RIVER RESERVATION
Defendant / Appellant: NAOMI TILLISON
Defendant / Appellee: ENBRIDGE ENERGY COMPANY, INC. and ENBRIDGE ENERGY, L.P.
Amicus Curiae: GOVERNMENT OF CANADA, NORTH AMERICA'S BUILDING TRADES UNIONS AND UNITED STEELWORKERS, AFL-CIO-CLC, AMERICAN FUEL & PETROCHEMICAL MANUFACTURERS and others
FTC v. Microsoft Corporation, et al
as 23-15992
Plaintiff / Appellant: FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION
Defendant / Appellee: MICROSOFT CORPORATION and ACTIVISION BLIZZARD, INC.
Amicus Curiae: LAW PROFESSORS, FORMER STATE ATTORNEYS GENERAL, JAHNA LINDERMUTH, DOUG PETERSON, HERBERT H. SLATERY III, and JOHN SUTHERS, BUSINESS ROUNDTABLE and others
Federal Trade Commission v. Amazon.com Inc We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00932
Plaintiff: Federal Trade Commission
Defendant: Amazon.com, Inc., Amazon.com Inc, Neil Lindsay and others
Interested Party: Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America
Amicus Curiae: Computer & Communications Industry Association, NetChoice, LLC, Chamber of Progress and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 0045 Federal Trade Commission Act
Dayton Area Chamber of Commerce et al v. Becerra et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv00156
Plaintiff: Dayton Area Chamber of Commerce, Ohio Chamber Of Commerce, Michigan Chamber of Commerce and others
Defendant: xavier becerra, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Chiquita Brooks-Lasure and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Speech First v. Shrum
as 23-6054
Plaintiff / Appellant: SPEECH FIRST, INC.
Defendant / Appellee: KAYSE SHRUM, in her official capacity as President of Oklahoma State University
Petitioner: AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION, AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION OF OKLAHOMA, CATHOLICVOTE.ORG EDUCATION FUND and others
9REN Holding S.A.R.L. v. Kingdom of Spain
as 23-7032
Plaintiff / Appellee: 9REN Holding S.A.R.L.
Defendant / Appellant: Kingdom of Spain
Amicus Curiae: The European Commission, MOL Hungarian Oil and Gas PLC, Crina Baltag, Prof. and others
Nextera Energy Global Holdings B.V., et al v. Kingdom of Spain
as 23-7031
Petitioner: Nextera Energy Global Holdings B.V. and Nextera Energy Spain Holdings B.V.
Respondent: Kingdom of Spain
Amicus Curiae: The European Commission, Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America, The Kingdom of the Netherlands and others
Sysco Corporation v. Glaz LLC et al
as 1:2023cv01451
Petitioner: Sysco Corporation
Respondent: Glaz LLC, Posen Investments LP and Kenosha Investments LP
Amicus Curiae: Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 0010 Petition to Vacate Arbitration Award
In re: Mary Carr, et al v. Google LLC, et al
as 23-15285
Not Classified By Court: In re: GOOGLE PLAY STORE ANTITRUST LITIGATION
Plaintiff / Appellee: MARY CARR, Individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, DIANNE BENTLEY, JENNIFER GRACE and others
Defendant / Appellant: GOOGLE LLC, GOOGLE IRELAND LIMITED, GOOGLE COMMERCE LIMITED and others
Intervenor: AMAZON.COM LLC
Amicus Curiae: ATLANTIC LEGAL FOUNDATION, WASHINGTON LEGAL FOUNDATION, BUSINESS AND ANTITRUST LAW PROFESSORS and others
United States of America v. Denka Performance Elastomer LLC et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00735
Plaintiff: United States of America
Counter Claimant: Denka Performance Elastomer LLC
Defendant: DuPont Specialty Products USA, LLC
Petitioner: Louisiana Chemical Association, American Chemistry Council, Chamber of Commerce of the United States of America and others
Cross Defendant: Michael S. Regan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 7401 Clean Air Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?