Cases
Cases 21 - 30 of 271
Victoria Dillihunt v. Roman Catholic Church Germany et al
as 2:2023cv03246
Plaintiff: Victoria Dillihunt
Defendant: Roman Catholic Church Germany and The Great Synagogue in Jerusalem United Kingdom
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lewis v. The Government of England and the United Kingdom
as 23-500
Plaintiff / Appellant: Marion T.D. Lewis, Individually and on Behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee: The Government of England and the United Kingdom, Attn: Rt Hon Victoria Prentis MP in her capacity as Attorney General for the United Kingdom and the Monarchy or Crown; and Michael Tomlinson in his capacity as Solicitor General of the United Kingdom and The Institution of the British Monarchy or The Crown, Attn: Rt Hon Victoria Prentis MP in her capacity as Attorney General for the United Kingdom and the Monarchy or Crown; and Michael Tomlinson in his capacity as Solicitor General of the United King
Lewis v. The Government of England and the United Kingdom
as 23-544
Plaintiff / Appellant: Marion T.D. Lewis, Individually and on Behalf of all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellee: The Government of England and the United Kingdom, Attn: Rt Hon Victoria Prentis MP in her capacity as Attorney General for the United Kingdom and the Monarchy or Crown; and Michael Tomlinson in his capacity as Solicitor General of the United Kingdom and The Institution of the British Monarchy or The Crown, Attn: Rt Hon Victoria Prentis MP in her capacity as Attorney General for the United Kingdom and the Monarchy or Crown; and Michael Tomlinson in his capacity as Solicitor General of the United King
Burberry Limited, A United Kingdom Company et al v. 5787451 et al
as 0:2023cv60479
Plaintiff: Burberry Limited, A United Kingdom Company and Burberry Limited, a New York Corporation
Defendant: 5787451, 912738352, 1100262167 and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
Phoenix Light SF Limited et al v. HSBC Bank USA, National Association We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2014cv10101
Plaintiff: Phoenix Light SF Limited, C-Bass CBO XVII Ltd., Silver Elms CDO II Limited and others
Defendant: HSBC Bank USA, National Association
Not Classified By Court: PIMCO Europe Ltd. (Subsidiary)-London, United Kingdom
Interested Party: Triaxx Prime CDO 2006-1, Ltd., Triaxx Prime CDO 2006-2, Ltd. and Triaxx Prime CDO 2007-1, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77 Securities Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv01271
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Burberry Limited, A United Kingdom Company et al v. The Individuals, Business Entities, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A"
as 0:2023cv60198
Plaintiff: Burberry Limited, A United Kingdom Company and Burberry Limited, a New York Corporation
Defendant: The Individuals, Business Entities, and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule "A", 12twe.shop, 86kallielux.com and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114 Trademark Infringement
CPV Productions, Inc. v. Drum OMG, Ltd., et al
as 23-55041
Plaintiff / Appellant: CPV PRODUCTIONS, INC., a California corporation, DBA Saville Productions
Defendant / Appellee: DRUM OMG, LTD., a United Kingdom limited company and DOES, 1-10, inclusive
The Estate of Chi Modu v. Twentyfourseven, SRL et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2023cv00890
Plaintiff: The Estate of Chi Modu
Defendant: Twentyfourseven, SRL, 247 Pacific, Inc., Matches Fashion Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Dwyer v. United Kingdom General Communications Headquarters
as 22-3012
Plaintiff / Appellant: Thomas F. Dwyer
Defendant / Appellee: United Kingdom General Communications Headquarters (UKGCHQ) and Malcolm John Tombs

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?