Cases 21 - 30 of 148
Bowers v. Rogers et al
as 5:2021cv03224
Plaintiff:
Faheem L. Bowers
Defendant:
Samuel Rogers, (fnu) Roemich, (fnu) Spellman and others
Petitioner:
Donzell A. Jones, Antonio B. Flemming and Emmanuel J. Sanders
Interested Party:
CoreCivic
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Rogers et al
as 5:2021cv03197
Plaintiff:
Anthony Thompson
Defendant:
Samuel Rogers, (fnu) Roemich, (fnu) Spellman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cheatham v. Thompson et al
as 5:2021cv03195
Petitioner:
William Christopher Cheatham
Respondent:
Todd Thompson, (fnu) Kuckleman and Andrew Dedeke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Luoma v. Thompson
as 6:2021cv01187
Plaintiff:
Savannah Luoma
Defendant:
Rheagan Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Davison (ID 104466) v. Butler et al
as 5:2021cv03145
Defendant:
(fnu) Thompson, Jarris Perkins and Jeff Butler
Plaintiff:
Charles Davison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thompson v. Core Civic
as 5:2020cv03319
Defendant:
Core Civic
Plaintiff:
Kenneth L. Thompson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thompson et al v. Way et al
as 6:2020cv01195
Plaintiff:
Richard L. Thompson, Jr. and Pamela Thompson
Defendant:
Adam Way and Aurora Cooperative Elevator Company doing business as Boardman Aerial Spraying doing business as Aurora Ag Aviation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Perks et al v. Ingmire et al
as 2:2020cv02129
Defendant:
Bryan Dorrel, Highland Community College and Eric Ingmire
Plaintiff:
Thomas Prater, Antoine Thompson, Donmonic Perks and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Herndon v. Martin, Pringle, Oliver, Wallace & Bauer, LLP et al
as 6:2019cv01347
Defendant:
Martin, Pringle, Oliver, Wallace & Bauer, LLP and Richard K. Thompson
Plaintiff:
Shari Herndon
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 2601
Thomas v. Thompson
as 5:2019cv03235
Respondent:
Patrick H. Thompson
Petitioner:
Darris Colton Thomas, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
