Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00530
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1986
McDaniel v. Bailey et al
as 3:2018cv00204
Plaintiff:
Tigress Sydney Acute McDaniel
Defendant:
Michelle Feimster Bailey, Infinity Bail Bonds, LLC, Richard Huffman and others
Cause Of Action: Conspiracy to Interfere with Civil Rights
McDaniel v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools et al
as 3:2018cv00205
Plaintiff:
Tigress Sydney Acute McDaniel
Defendant:
Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools, Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of Education, Patricia Falk and others
Cause Of Action: Conspiracy to Interfere with Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
McDaniel v. Bailey et al
as 3:2017cv00448
Plaintiff:
Tigress Sydney Acute McDaniel
Defendant:
Michelle Feimster Bailey, Infinity Bail Bonds, LLC, Richard Huffman and others
Cause Of Action: Conspiracy to Interfere with Civil Rights
Tigress McDaniel v. VTT Management Inc.
as 17-1841
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIGRESS SYDNEY ACUTE MCDANIEL, as lawful guardian ad litem of Minor Child A.M.
Defendant - Appellee:
VTT MANAGEMENT INC., VTT CHARLOTTE LLC, DEBBIE HICKS and others
McDaniel v. VTT Management Inc. et al
as 3:2016cv00826
Plaintiff:
Tigress Sydney Acute McDaniel
Defendant:
VTT Management Inc. , VTT Charlotte LLC , Debbie Hicks and others
Cause Of Action: Conspiracy to Interfere with Civil Rights
MCDANIEL v. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA
as 1:2015cv00017
Plaintiff:
TIGRESS SYDNEY ACUTE MCDANIEL
Defendant:
STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA, 18TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF NORTH CAROLINA AND GUILFORD COUNTY, CITY OF GREENSBORO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
MCDANIEL v. MEISTER et al
as 1:2013cv00952
Plaintiff:
TIGRESS SYDNEY ACUTE MCDANIEL
Defendant:
EMILY JEFFORDS MEISTER, JAMES M. WEBB, JAMES S. PFAFF and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
