Cases 21 - 30 of 434
Stevens et al v. United States of America
as 1:2023cv10819
Plaintiff:
Barbara Stevens, Charles Borchard, Dennis Borchard and others
Petitioner:
Dalweet Kaur Doing business as Edenville Market
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346 Tort Claim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00270
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Griggs v. Gildersleeve et al
as 1:2022cv00908
Plaintiff:
Julie A. Griggs
Defendant:
Freddy J. Gildersleeve and Tom Ottery Transit, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Kelmendi v. Dionovic et al
as 2:2022cv12393
Plaintiff:
Tom Dionovic and John Kelmendi
Defendant:
Carol Septer, Guaresimo, JOHN DOE and others
Reilly v. St. Clair County et al
as 2:2022cv11952
Plaintiff:
Jamie Reilly
Defendant:
St. Clair County, St. Clair County Jail, St. Clair County Commissioners and others
Stovall #601852 v. Prisk et al
as 2:2022cv00146
Plaintiff:
Larry M. Stovall #601852
Defendant:
Tom Prisk and Doug Tasson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv10720
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Marks v. LaJoye - Young et al
as 1:2022cv00288
Plaintiff:
Cedric Marks
Defendant:
Michelle LaJoye - Young, Grand Rapids, City of, Chuck DeWitt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Craig Everett v. Uaw Local 699 et al
as 1:2021cv12648
Defendant:
Craig Everett, Uaw Local 699, Tom Hurst and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Ibrahim et al v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.
as 2:2022cv10015
Plaintiff:
Ibrahim Tom Ibrahim and Sofia Youhanna Ibrahim
Defendant:
Liberty Mutual Insurance Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
