Cases 21 - 30 of 1,379
Williams v. U.S. Department of State et al
as 3:2024cv00284
Plaintiff:
Caleb Williams
Defendant:
U.S. Department of State, Attorney General Of The United States and United States Attorney For The Eastern District of Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01094
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
PROTECT THE PUBLIC'S TRUST v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE
as 1:2024cv01083
Plaintiff:
PROTECT THE PUBLIC'S TRUST
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01064
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Mohammadi v. Blinken et al
as 2:2024cv10925
Plaintiff:
Somayeh Mohammadi
Defendant:
Antony J. Blinken, Eric Gaudiosi, U.S. Department of State and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00988
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00614
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1402 US as Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 9:2024cv80377
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
CENTER TO ADVANCE SECURITY IN AMERICA v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE
as 1:2024cv00850
Plaintiff:
CENTER TO ADVANCE SECURITY IN AMERICA
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
JUDICIAL WATCH, INC. v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE
as 1:2024cv00840
Plaintiff:
JUDICIAL WATCH, INC.
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF STATE
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 552 Freedom of Information Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
