Cases 21 - 30 of 2,220
Mullenix v. USA
as 4:2024cv00210
Petitioner:
Donald Ryan Mullenix
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Muldrow v. USA et al
as 4:2024cv00171
Plaintiff:
Larry D Muldrow
Defendant:
USA and Robin Duty
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Brickey v. Geo Group Inc et al
as 4:2024cv00150
Plaintiff:
Christopher Brickey
Defendant:
Geo Group Inc, G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Doe v. G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc et al
as 4:2024cv00149
Plaintiff:
John Doe
Defendant:
G4S Secure Solutions (USA) Inc and Rite of Passage
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Hutchinson v. USA
as 4:2024cv00145
Petitioner:
Jeremy Young Hutchinson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Hutchinson v. USA
as 4:2024cv00144
Petitioner:
Jeremy Young Hutchinson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Beard v. USA
as 4:2024cv00129
Petitioner:
Alonzo Beard
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00127
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Maverick USA Inc v. Independent Contractors of Maverick Transportation LLC
as 4:2024cv00115
Plaintiff:
Maverick USA Inc
Defendant:
Independent Contractors of Maverick Transportation LLC doing business as Maverick Transportation LLC Ind Cont
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Parker v. USA
as 4:2024cv00104
Petitioner:
Cecil Samuel Parker, Jr
Defendant:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
