Cases filed in Kentucky
Cases 21 - 30 of 60
Milton v. USP Big Sandy
as 7:2022cv00100
Petitioner: Marcus Milton
Respondent: USP Big Sandy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Pleasant v. Bureau of Prisons et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2022cv00052
Petitioner: Raheem Pleasant
Respondent: Bureau of Prisons and Warden of USP-Big Sandy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Torres-Guardado v. Warden, USP Big Sandy We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2022cv00004
Petitioner: Jose Angel Torres-Guardado
Respondent: Warden, USP Big Sandy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Robinson v. Warden, USP Big Sandy We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2021cv00046
Petitioner: Zhivago Anwah Robinson
Respondent: Warden, USP Big Sandy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Dixon v. USP Big Sandy et al
as 7:2021cv00026
Defendant: A. Carter, J. Price, M. Lefever and others
Plaintiff: Dijon T. Dixon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McLendon v. USP Big Sandy
as 7:2020cv00148
Defendant: USP Big Sandy
Plaintiff: Jahleel McLendon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lucas v. USP Big Sandy
as 7:2020cv00127
Plaintiff: Andre Lucas
Defendant: USP Big Sandy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Harris v. USP Big Sandy Warden Joyner et al
as 7:2020cv00098
Defendant: USP Big Sandy Administration, USP Big Sandy Staff/Employees and USP Big Sandy Warden Joyner
Plaintiff: Charlie Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Quiroz v. USP Big Sandy Staff
as 7:2020cv00097
Defendant: USP Big Sandy Staff
Plaintiff: Michel Quiroz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thomas v. USP Big Sandy Penitentiary We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 7:2020cv00085
Plaintiff: Julius Lee Thomas
Defendant: USP Big Sandy Penitentiary
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?