Cases 21 - 29 of 29
St Paul Fire & Marine Ins Co v. Velocity Express Inc
as 3:2008cv00904
Plaintiff:
St Paul Fire & Marine Ins Co
Defendant:
Velocity Express Inc
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Santacruz et al v. Velocity Express Corporation et al
as 1:2008cv21591
Plaintiff:
Guillermo Santacruz, Guillermo Santacruz, Diogenes Peralta and others
Defendant:
Velocity Express Corporation, Velocity Express Leasing, Inc. and Velocity Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Parizek v. Velocity Express Inc
as 1:2008cv00478
Plaintiff:
Gary L Parizek, Gary L Parizek and Gary L Parizek
Defendant:
Velocity Express Inc
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Valdez v. Velocity Express, Inc.
as 1:2008cv21351
Plaintiff:
Pavel Valdez
Defendant:
Velocity Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Baker v. Velocity Express Inc
as 5:2008cv00417
Plaintiff:
Sandra Baker
Defendant:
Velocity Express Inc
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Jones et al v. Velocity Express Leasing, Inc. et al
as 3:2008cv00773
Plaintiff:
Philip Jones and Kim Keo
Defendant:
Velocity Express Leasing, Inc., Velocity Express Leasing, Inc., Velocity Express, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Heath Jobe v. Velocity Express Inc et al
as 5:2007cv01693
Plaintiff:
Heath Jobe, Heath Jobe and Heath Jobe
Defendant:
Velocity Express Inc, Velocity Express Inc, Velocity Express Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal - Labor/Mgmnt. Relations
Charles et al v. Velocity Express Corporation et al
as 6:2007cv06610
Plaintiff:
James Charles, Harold Smith and Gary Ketchum
Defendant:
Velocity Express Corporation, Velocity Express Leasing, Inc. and Velocity Express, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1145 E.R.I.S.A.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2007cv00255
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
