Cases 21 - 30 of 404
Bailey v. Vantell
as 1:2023cv01257
Petitioner:
Jamie Bailey
Respondent:
Warden Vance Vantell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Haven, Jr. v. Brun
as 1:2023cv01242
Petitioner:
Joseph Lester Haven, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Chris Brun
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lowrance v. CoreCivic et al
as 3:2023cv01159
Plaintiff:
Pamela Lowrance
Defendant:
CoreCivic doing business as Trousdale Turner Correctional Facility, Trousdale County, Tennessee, Warden Martin Frink and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vrancea v. Bowers
as 2:2023cv02701
Petitioner:
Ion Catalin Vrancea
Respondent:
F. J. Bowers and Warden C. Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Collins v. State of Tennessee
as 3:2023cv00387
Petitioner:
Glenn Thomas Collins
Respondent:
State of Tennessee
Defendant:
Warden Johnny Fitz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Price v. Watwood
as 3:2023cv01140
Petitioner:
Dustin Shawn Price
Respondent:
Warden Brandon Watwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Haven, Jr. v. Brun
as 3:2023cv01097
Petitioner:
Joseph Lester Haven, Jr.
Respondent:
Warden Chris Brun
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perry v. CoreCivic et al
as 3:2023cv01081
Plaintiff:
John Perry and John C. Perry, Sr.
Defendant:
CoreCivic, Warden f/n/u Van Tiel, Officer f/n/u DeVille and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Perry
as 3:2023cv00372
Petitioner:
MARCUS THOMAS
Respondent:
Warden GRADY PERRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Kwaning v. Harrison
as 2:2023cv02658
Petitioner:
Mohammed Kwaning
Respondent:
Warden Bowers and Warden Harrison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
