Cases 21 - 30 of 172
Austin v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv00969
Plaintiff:
Ann H. Austin
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
WHITE v. CHALQ, INC. et al
as 1:2023cv00345
Plaintiff:
ALEX WHITE
Defendant:
CHALQ, INC., GABE HILL and AUSTIN DICKERSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Contract Dispute
DeGrange v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00243
Plaintiff:
Austin L. DeGrange
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BYRD v. NC DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH and HUMAN SERVICES
as 1:2023cv00320
Plaintiff:
AUSTIN WAYNE BYRD
Defendant:
NC DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Peoples v. Charlotte-Meck Police Department et al
as 3:2023cv00207
Plaintiff:
William Henry Peoples, lll
Defendant:
Charlotte-Meck Police Department, Public Defenders Office, State of North Carolina Judges and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00191
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Parker v. Gould et al
as 1:2023cv00075
Plaintiff:
Gary Dean Parker, Jr
Defendant:
Anthony Gould, J. Moore, LT Littrel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. AUSTIN et al
as 1:2023cv00086
Plaintiff:
WILMA KAY DAVIS
Defendant:
KEVIN AUSTIN, J. GREGORY MATTHEWS, VALARIE ZACHARY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Civil Rights Violation
Pittman v. Moss et al
as 5:2022cv00175
Plaintiff:
Austin Reid Pittman
Defendant:
FNU Moss, FNU Kinder and FNU Lay
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Austin v. USA
as 4:2022cv00142
Petitioner:
Nehemiah Christopher Austin
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
