Cases 21 - 30 of 347
Brown v. City of Chattanooga et al
as 1:2024cv00042
Plaintiff:
Howard Brown
Defendant:
City of Chattanooga, Karli Thomas and Austin Garrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Johnpier v. Prince et al
as 1:2024cv00033
Plaintiff:
Gordon Johnpier
Defendant:
Ronnie Prince, Austin Swing and Dr. Kenneth Matthews
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Coffee County, Tennessee et al
as 4:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Justin Phillips
Defendant:
Coffee County, Tennessee, Steven Austin Qualls, Blake Simmons and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01365
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Hopper v. Prince et al
as 1:2023cv00293
Plaintiff:
Dustin Lee Hopper
Defendant:
Ronnie Prince, Austin Swing, Charles Ricket and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv01295
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Ayers v. Buford et al
as 2:2023cv02772
Plaintiff:
Keshawn Ayers
Defendant:
Sgt. Buford, Officer Avalos, Lt. Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnpier et al v. Prince et al
as 1:2023cv00289
Petitioner:
Gordon Blake Johnpier and Dustin Lee Hopper
Respondent:
Ronnie Prince, Austin Swing, Charles Ricket and others
Defendant:
Dr. Kenneth Matthews and All Healthcare Providers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Allen v. Swing
as 2:2023cv00156
Petitioner:
Johnathan Allen
Respondent:
Austin Swing
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ridgway v. Dickson County Sheriff's Office
as 3:2023cv01252
Plaintiff:
Layne Austin Ridgway
Defendant:
Dickson County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
