Cases 21 - 30 of 123
Compton v. Work Management, Inc.
as 4:2019cv04789
Plaintiff:
Kristina Compton and Monte Moore
Defendant:
Work Management, Inc. and High Bridge Associates, Inc.
Stallings v. Beavers et al
as 3:2019cv01839
Plaintiff:
Robert E Stallings, Sr
Defendant:
Mr NFN Compton, Ms Sandy NLN and Mr NFN Beavers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Compton v. Davis
as 4:2019cv01955
Petitioner:
Edward Compton
Respondent:
Lorie Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ryans, et al v DSV Road Inc
as 1:2019cv00004
Plaintiff:
Earl Rogers Williams, Jr, Letizia Ryans and Jalissa Branch Compton
Defendant:
DSV Road Inc
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Christopher Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Compton v. Doe et al
as 3:2018cv03396
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Diane Urey, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Ragenal T Compton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Compton v. U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee et al
as 4:2018cv00731
Plaintiff:
Lee Compton
Defendant:
Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc. and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee
Undetermined:
Jay C Zeleskey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Sentry Equipment Corp. v. Evans et al
as 6:2018cv00417
Plaintiff:
Sentry Equipment Corp.
Defendant:
Best and Compton Enterprise, LLC, Gary K. Evans, Aceco Machine, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Compton v. U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee et al
as 4:2018cv00255
Plaintiff:
Lee Compton
Defendant:
U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee and Select Portfolio Servicing, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 191
Harrison v. Mohammed et al
as 4:2017cv00328
Plaintiff:
Davie Harrison, Sr
Defendant:
Fayez Mohammed, Rebecca Medlock, Yvonne K. Haung, MD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Miles-Brown v. Love & Joy Personal Care Home et al
as 4:2017cv00964
Plaintiff:
Natcha Miles-Brown
Defendant:
Love & Joy Personal Care Home and Lover Compton
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
