Cases 21 - 30 of 55
Abdul-Ghafoor, et al v. Professional Transportation, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv01105
Plaintiff:
Yuwsuf Abdul-Ghafoor, Rhoda Kathleen Blair, Linda Cohill and others
Defendant:
Professional Transportation, Inc. and Ronald D. Romain
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Securian Life Insurance Company v. Dawson et al
as 1:2017cv01259
Plaintiff:
Securian Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
David Dawson, Beth P. Ullom, Ian C. Payne and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Payne v. Morgan County Circuit Court et al
as 5:2017cv00074
Petitioner:
John William Payne
Respondent:
Morgan County Circuit Court, State of WV and Shelby Spiker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Payne v. State of West Virginia et al
as 2:2017cv00069
Petitioner:
John William Payne
Respondent:
State of West Virginia and Shelby Spiker
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Payne v. Sheeley et al
as 2:2017cv00056
Petitioner:
John William Payne
Respondent:
Sheely and State of West Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Payne v. Roman Catholic Archbishop of Agana, a Corporation sole
as 1:2017cv00031
Plaintiff:
William Payne
Defendant:
Roman Catholic Archbishop of Agana, a Corporation sole , DOE Entities 1-5 and Doe-Individuals 6-50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2017cv00402
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Sherman Payne, Jr. v. USA
as 16-1629
Petitioner - Appellant:
SHERMAN WILLIAM PAYNE, JR.
Respondent - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Payne v. Smith
as 8:2016cv00304
Plaintiff:
William Payne
Defendant:
Amy E. Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
W.C. Payne Family Trust v. The Village of Matteson, Illinois et al
as 1:2016cv00262
Plaintiff:
W.C. Payne Family Trust
Defendant:
The Village of Matteson, Illinois , Debra Howard and William Payne
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
