Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Hatcher v. Wynne et al (INMATE 1)
as 2:2013cv00226
Plaintiff:
Ronald Lee Hatcher
Defendant:
William Wynne, Robert Longshore, Cliff Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROBINSON et al v. NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE et al
as 2:2012cv03731
Plaintiff:
DAVE ROBINSON , BRIAN S. ALLEN , JAMES BETTERSON and others
Defendant:
NATIONAL FOOTBALL LEAGUE, NFL PROPERTIES LLC and JOHN DOES 1 THROUGH 100
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Lutfi Talal v. Quenton White, et al
as 09-5707
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LUTFI SHAFQ TALAL
Defendant - Appellee:
QUENTON WHITE, Commissioner, HOWARD COOK, Assistant Commissioner, FLORA HOLLAND, Warden, Warden and others
Herrod v. Wynn et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2009cv00203
Plaintiff:
McArthur Herrod
Defendant:
William Wynn, Velinda Weatherly and Steve McGill
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Pope v. McGill et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2009cv00106
Plaintiff:
Willie Pope
Defendant:
Steve McGill, William Wynn and Velinda Weatherly
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Henley v. McGriff et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2009cv00055
Plaintiff:
Richard Henley
Defendant:
Seven McGriff, William Wynn and Velinda Weatherly
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Smith v. Wynn, et al (INMATE2)
as 2:2009cv00006
Plaintiff:
Danny Lee Smith
Defendant:
William Wynn, Steve McGill and Velinda Weatherly
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Henley et al v. McGriff et al (INMATE 2)
as 2:2008cv01004
Plaintiff:
Richard Henley
Defendant:
Seven McGriff, William Wynn, Velinda Weatherly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WYNNE et al v. NATIONAL GYPSUM CO. et al
as 2:2007cv68093
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM WYNNE and MILDRED WYNNE
Defendant:
NATIONAL GYPSUM CO., CERTAINTEED CORP., . UNTIED STATES GYPSUM CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
