Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 21 - 30 of 41
RUSHING v. FREEMAN et al
as 1:2021cv00091
Defendant: DUNN, FRENCH, WINNINGHAM and others
Plaintiff: JOSEPH RUSHING
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOWLES v. ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE INC. et al
as 1:2020cv03204
Defendant: ARAMARK FOOD SERVICE INC., JANE DOE, H. WINNINGHAM and others
Plaintiff: RANDALL BOWLES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
CRAWFORD v. SEVIER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv02823
Defendant: DAVIS, MARTIN, M. STROBEL and others
Plaintiff: TYLER CRAWFORD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BOWLES v. INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION et al
as 1:2020cv02669
Defendant: INDIANA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, STEVEN CARTER and H. WINNINGHAM
Plaintiff: RANDALL BOWLES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. CARTER et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv02493
Defendant: NEAL FETZ, FRENCH, ROBERT E. CARTER and others
Plaintiff: DONALD L. JACKSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
YOUNG v. GEO GOUP INC. et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv02328
Defendant: NEAL FETZ, TEMPLE, GEO GOUP INC. and others
Plaintiff: OTIS YOUNG, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LOPEZ v. WEXFORD INC. et al
as 1:2020cv02031
Defendant: FRYE, DAVID A. CADOGAN, WINNINGHAM and others
Plaintiff: JOSE LOPEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. WINNINGHAM et al
as 1:2020cv01914
Defendant: T. THOMPSON, S. WINNINGHAM and G.E.O.
Plaintiff: JAMES J. JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LESTER v. ADAMS et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2020cv01410
Defendant: ADAMS, WEXFORD OF INDIANA LLC, WORTH and others
Plaintiff: DEAJAY LESTER
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. GEO GROUP, INC. et al
as 1:2019cv04750
Defendant: HANNAH WINNINGHAM, FISHER, O. OGIKE and others
Plaintiff: FREDDIE BAILEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?