Cases 21 - 30 of 43
Clark v. Brown et al
as 5:2017cv00798
Plaintiff:
Jesse Daniel Clark, II
Defendant:
Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Director Department of Corrections and Warden at San Quentin State Prison
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Paul Bolin v. Ron Davi
as 16-99009
Petitioner - Appellant:
PAUL C. BOLIN
Respondent - Appellee:
RON DAVIS, Warden of San Quentin State Prison
Jerry Frye v. USDC-SAC
as 16-73030
:
In re: JERRY GRANT FRYE
Petitioner:
JERRY GRANT FRYE
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Real Party In Interest:
WARDEN OF SAN QUENTIN STATE PRISON, State of California
Whalen v. Warden of San Quentin
as 1:2014cv01865
Petitioner:
Daniel Lee Whalen
Respondent:
Warden of San Quentin State Prison
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kevin Chappell v. USDC-CAFR
as 14-70836
:
In re: KEVIN CHAPPELL, Warden of San Quentin State Prison
Petitioner:
KEVIN CHAPPELL, Warden of San Quentin State Prison
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, FRESNO
Real Party In Interest:
JOHN MICHAEL BEAMES
John Beames v. Kevin Chappell
as 13-17325
Petitioner - Appellee:
JOHN MICHAEL BEAMES
Respondent - Appellant:
KEVIN CHAPPELL, Warden, Warden of San Quentin Prison
Oscar Gates v. Warden at San Quentin
as 2:2013cv06995
Petitioner:
Oscar Gates
Respondent:
Warden at San Quentin
Kenneth Earl Gay v. Warden of San Quentin State Prison et al
as 2:2012cv04718
Defendant:
California Appellate Project, California Attorney General, California State Bar Assoc. and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Earl Gay
Brady v. Warden of San Quentin State Prison et. al. et al
as 3:2012cv00850
Petitioner:
Roger Hoan Brady
Respondent:
Oregon Attorney General and Warden of San Quentin State Prison et. al.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
William Soto v. Warden of San Quentin State Pr
as 12-15638
Petitioner - Appellant:
WILLIAM SOTO
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN OF SAN QUENTIN STATE PRISON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
