Cases 21 - 30 of 30
Paul Goist v. Charles Samuels
as 15-7368
Plaintiff - Appellant:
PAUL BENJAMIN GOIST, a/k/a Paul Benjamin Goist
Defendant - Appellee:
CHARLES SAMUELS, Director of the Federal Bureau of Prisons, in his official and individual capacity, REAR ADMIRAL NEWTON E. KENDIG, M.D., In his official and individual capacity, HARRELL WATTS, In his Official and Individual Capacity and others
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Fincher v. United State of America
as 9:2015cv01479
Petitioner:
Starks Fincher, Jr
Respondent:
Warden of FCI-Williamsburg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Scott v. United States of America
as 1:2013cv01028
Petitioner:
Wilbur Scott, Jr
Respondent:
Warden of FCI Williamsburg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
Kevin McDaniels v. John Owen
as 12-7459
Petitioner - Appellant:
KEVIN WAYNE MCDANIELS
Respondent - Appellee:
JOHN R. OWEN, Warden at FCI Williamsburg
McDaniels v. State of South Carolina
as 1:2012cv00975
Petitioner:
Kevin Wayne McDaniels
Respondent:
Warden of FCI-Williamsburg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Aikens v. Warden of FCI Williamsburg
as 5:2011cv00482
Petitioner:
JIM HENRY AIKENS
Respondent:
Warden of FCI Williamsburg and GEORGIA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Aikens v. Warden of FCI Williamsburg
as 1:2011cv00414
Petitioner:
Jim Henry Aikens
Respondent:
Warden of FCI Williamsburg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Octavius Cline v. Warden of FCI-Williamsburg
as 10-7741
Petitioner - Appellant:
OCTAVIUS S. CLINE
Respondent - Appellee:
WARDEN OF FCI-WILLIAMSBURG
Lagos-M v. Owen et al
as 0:2008cv02913
Petitioner:
Ramon Odin Lagos-M
Respondent:
Warden of FCI Williamsburg
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hughes v. United States of America
as 0:2008cv01784
Petitioner:
Randall Jim Hughes
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden of FCI Williamsburg
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
