Cases 21 - 30 of 58
Gonzales #336466 v. Brady et al
as 2:2020cv01621
Defendant:
John Rea, Treena J Kay, Ryan Thomas and others
Plaintiff:
Arnez Louis Ralphael Gonzales
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EPCOR Water Arizona Incorporated et al v. Brady et al
as 3:2020cv08045
Plaintiff:
Chad Gebow and EPCOR Water Arizona Incorporated
Defendant:
Annette Wegmann, Tami Ring, Kathy Bruck and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Olmos v. Cimino et al
as 2:2020cv00034
Defendant:
Michael Cimino, Psychological & Consulting Services, Paul Penzone and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Paul Olmos
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brady v. C R Bard Incorporated et al
as 2:2019cv03437
Defendant:
C R Bard Incorporated and Bard Peripheral Vascular Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Ryan Brady
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2018cv01019
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brady v. Chhatpar et al
as 2:2017cv04230
Plaintiff:
Christopher Shawn Brady
Defendant:
Sunil Chhatpar, Stephen P Peck and Unknown Baniewicz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brady v. Maricopa, County of et al
as 2:2017cv03420
Plaintiff:
Derrick Brady
Defendant:
Maricopa, County of, Joseph M Arpaio and Paul Penzone
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Moxie Pest Control LP v. Moxie Service LLC
as 2:2017cv02041
Plaintiff:
Moxie Pest Control LP
Defendant:
Moxie Service LLC, Brady Bruce and Unknown Bruce
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125
Law Office of Sylvia L Thomas et al v. Arizona Supreme Court et al
as 2:2017cv01409
Defendant:
Delegacion Procuraduria Federal del Consumidor de Puebla, Unknown Doyle, Unknown Mumina and others
Plaintiff:
SLT Business Enterprises, Law Office of Sylvia L Thomas and Sylvia Lynne Thomas
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Brady v. Colvin
as 2:2016cv04436
Plaintiff:
Savannah Brady
Defendant:
Carolyn W Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
