Cases 21 - 30 of 1,091
Davis v. Cruiser RV, LLC
as 3:2024cv00258
Plaintiff:
Keldon C. Davis
Defendant:
Cruiser RV, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
DAVIS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2024cv00518
Petitioner:
JALEN DAVIS
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
BROWN v. CENTURION HEALTH, et al
as 1:2024cv00495
Plaintiff:
ROJAE BROWN
Defendant:
CENTURION HEALTH, TEAH, JOHN CARTER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CONWELL v. SEVIER et al
as 1:2024cv00501
Plaintiff:
CHRISTOPHER LEO CONWELL
Defendant:
MARK SEVIER, JENNIFER FRENCH, RAY DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ADAMS v. MEEKS et al
as 2:2024cv00085
Plaintiff:
TERRY T. ADAMS, JR.
Defendant:
JERRICHA MEEKS, STOOPY, DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SIMS v. SILVIA et al
as 1:2024cv00454
Plaintiff:
JOHN SIMS
Defendant:
SILVIA, DUNLAP, WELCH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DAVIS v. HASSAN et al
as 1:2024cv00363
Plaintiff:
TANNER DAVIS
Defendant:
AHMED HASSAN, STATES TRANSPORTATION and STATES TRANSPORTATION, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
WRIGHT v. STORM et al
as 1:2024cv00366
Plaintiff:
CARLTON WRIGHT
Defendant:
STORM, JENNIFER FRENCH, R. DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00191
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
WOODY et al v. REAGLE et al
as 1:2023cv02315
Plaintiff:
BRANDON WOODY, ANTHONY WHITE, MARCO WEBSTER and others
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT, CENTURION HEALTH OF INDIANA, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
