Cases 21 - 30 of 187
Abdur-Rahman v. Arrington, Jr. et al
as 1:2022cv03335
Plaintiff:
Khadijah Abdur-Rahman
Defendant:
Marvin Arrington, Jr., Natalie Hall, Elizabeth Liz Hausman and others
Pitts v. United States of America
as 4:2022cv00197
Petitioner:
Michael Lewis Pitts
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Martin v. Core Civic et al
as 3:2022cv00088
Defendant:
Sgt. Pitts, Core Civic, Wheeler Correctional Facility and others
Plaintiff:
Nolan Craig Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shuler v. Bowman et al
as 4:2022cv00128
Defendant:
Detective Brandt, Sheriff William Bowman, Captain J. McEady and others
Plaintiff:
Melodie Shuler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly et al v. Fulton County Board of Commissioners et al
as 1:2022cv01472
Plaintiff:
Robert H. Kelly and Ricky L. Blalock
Defendant:
Fulton County Board of Commissioners, Commissioner Marvin Arrington, Jr., Commissioner Natalie Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PITTS v. SMITH
as 4:2022cv00045
Petitioner:
GEORGE W PITTS, JR
Respondent:
Warden AMIEE SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Howard et al v. Reynolds et al
as 1:2022cv00412
Plaintiff:
Cornelius A. Howard, Davoric Tilman, Michael Anthony Thomas and others
Defendant:
Sgt. C. Reynold, Capt. Deese, Major Duane Whisenhunt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PITTS v. DOE
as 1:2022cv00002
Plaintiff:
BOBBY PITTS
Defendant:
JOHN AND OR JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv05055
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
CLAYTON v. GOODMAN et al
as 5:2021cv00418
Defendant:
SERGEANT FLOYD EDWARD, BRANDON GOODMAN, BARBARA CUMMING and others
Plaintiff:
EARNEST BARNARD CLAYTON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
