Cases 21 - 30 of 172
Witten v. Mississippi Department of Public Safety et al
as 5:2022cv00007
Plaintiff:
Carey Jason Witten
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Public Safety, Adams County Sheriff, Adams County, Mississippi and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Boler v. M.D.O.C. et al
as 3:2021cv00826
Plaintiff:
Travis Boler
Defendant:
M.D.O.C., State of Mississippi and Warden Franklin D. Brewer
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Travis v. Mountain Laurel Assurance Company et al
as 5:2021cv00083
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Lou Travis
Defendant:
Mountain Laurel Assurance Company and John Does Individuals and Entities #1-10
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Buggs et al v. Walker et al
as 3:2021cv00178
Plaintiff:
Jo Ann Buggs and Travis Buggs
Defendant:
Danisha L. Walker and Hertz Vehicle, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Flowers v. McDaniel
as 3:2021cv00432
Plaintiff:
Travis J. Flowers
Defendant:
Rick McDaniel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Ahmed et al v. City of Natchez, MS et al
as 5:2021cv00058
Defendant:
Shane Daugherty, Joseph Daughtery, John and Jane Does and others
Plaintiff:
Kennedy Hussain, Nasser Alhumasi and Abdulla Ahmed individually and doing business as EZ Quick Stop LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flowers v. DeJoy et al
as 3:2021cv00393
Defendant:
Pam Flaggs, West Pit, Megan J. Brennan and others
Plaintiff:
Travis J. Flowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Toles v. Richardson
as 3:2021cv00282
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Pervis Toles
Defendant:
Officer Richardson and Travis Richardson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lokey v. Martin
as 3:2021cv00181
Defendant:
Marcus Martin
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Plaintiff:
Travis Latrell Lokey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00294
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
