Cases 21 - 29 of 29
Kupahu v. Hightechlending Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv00690
Plaintiff:
Dianna Nalani Kupahu
Defendant:
Hightechlending Inc., Federal National Mortgage Association, Bank of America, N.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Straughter for Z.M.S., a Minor v. Colvin
as 2:2013cv04102
Plaintiff:
Nalani Straughter for Z.M.S., a Minor
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01602
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Jim Aana; et al. vs. Pioneer Hi-Bred International, Inc.
as 1:2012cv00231
Plaintiff:
Jim Aana , Marie Aana , Thelma Aana and others
Defendant:
Doe Defendants 1-10, Gay & Robinson, Inc. , Pioneer Hi-Bred International and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00109
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Briard v. Smith Maritime et al
as 1:2008cv00187
Plaintiff:
Russell Briard
Defendant:
Smith Maritime, Smith Maritime, Tow Boat Services & Management Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Briard v. Smith Maritime et al
as 2:2007cv01249
Plaintiff:
Russell Briard
Defendant:
Smith Maritime, Tow Boat Services & Management Inc, Hawaiian Interisland Towing Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688 Jones Act
Bailey v. Ramey et al
as 4:2007cv00210
Plaintiff:
Jamie Lamarr Bailey
Defendant:
Jay K Ramey, Nalani Ching, Sharon Holmes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Carroll v. Nakatani, et al
as 1:2000cv00641
Defendant:
Seiji Naya, Colette Y. Machado, Paul G. LaMahieu and others
Intervenor Plaintiff:
Emmett E. Lee Loy, Virgil E. Day and Patrick L. Kahawaiolaa
Intervenor Defendant:
Native Hawaiian Legal Corporation
Plaintiff:
John Carroll
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
