General Cases filed in Massachusetts
Cases 21 - 30 of 2,609
Smith v. Alves
as 1:2024cv10124
Petitioner: Craig Smith
Respondent: Nelson Alves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Morrison v. Superintendent MCI Shirley
as 1:2024cv10057
Petitioner: Maurice Morrison
Respondent: Superintendent MCI Shirley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Vitaly Borker v. Warden Bowers
as 1:2024cv10045
Petitioner: Vitaly Borker
Respondent: Warden Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Salsbury v. Gray
as 1:2024cv10052
Petitioner: Arthur E. Salsbury
Respondent: Dean Gray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Salsbury v. Gray
as 1:2024cv10050
Petitioner: Arthur E. Salsbury and Arthur E. Salsbury, Jr.
Respondent: Dean Gray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Schmitt v. Bowers We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv13203
Petitioner: Thomas Schmitt
Respondent: United States of America and Warden J. Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Perry v. Alves
as 1:2023cv13028
Petitioner: Frederick Perry
Respondent: Nelson B Alves
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Long v. Garland et al
as 4:2023cv40169
Petitioner: James Robert Long
Respondent: Merrick Garland and Warden Bowers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Larson v. Napier We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv12817
Petitioner: Thomas Larson
Respondent: Napier
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Cedeno-Lora v. FMC Warden
as 1:2023cv12800
Petitioner: Victor Cedeno-Lora
Respondent: FMC Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?