Cases 31 - 40 of 84,948
TAGLIAFERRO v. RACHEL THOMPSON, WARDEN
as 1:2024cv05414
Petitioner:
SALVATORE TAGLIAFERRO
Respondent:
RACHEL THOMPSON, WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
SAMUELS v. WARDEN RACHEL THOMPSON
as 1:2024cv05416
Petitioner:
MILTON SAMUELS
Respondent:
WARDEN RACHEL THOMPSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
GERMANY v. KLINEFELTER et al
as 2:2024cv00588
Petitioner:
TYRONE GERMANY
Respondent:
SCOTT KLINEFELTER and MICHELLE A. HENRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
SARKISOV v. UNDERWOOD
as 3:2024cv00088
Petitioner:
EDUARD SARKISOV
Respondent:
WARDEN MICHAEL UNDERWOOD
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Whitfield v. Christensen
as 1:2024cv00685
Petitioner:
Jesse Whitfield
Respondent:
Warden Christensen
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Stansbury v. Harry et al
as 1:2024cv00686
Plaintiff:
Kareem Stansbury
Defendant:
Laurel Harry, Michael Gourley, Zachary Molsak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LIRIANO-RODRIGUEZ v. THOMPSON et al
as 5:2024cv01707
Petitioner:
JONATHAN LIRIANO-RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
PATRICIA THOMPSON and MICHELLE HENRY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
ABDUL-ALI v. CLOSE et al
as 2:2024cv01706
Petitioner:
NAADIR HANIF ABDUL-ALI
Respondent:
DAVID CLOSE, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY FOR THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MITCHELL v. IRWIN et al
as 2:2024cv01702
Petitioner:
JAMIR MITCHELL
Respondent:
RANDY IRWIN, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF MONTGOMERY and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF PENNSYLVANIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
