Cases 31 - 40 of 646
Parker et al v. Tenneco Inc et al
as 2:2023cv10816
Plaintiff:
Tanika Parker and Andrew Farrier
Defendant:
Tenneco Inc., Driv Automotive Inc, Tenneco Automotive Operating Company Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00331
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00301
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12112 American With Disabilities Act- Discrimination
Bellefant v. Bray et al
as 2:2023cv10666
Plaintiff:
Stephen #230052 Bellefant and Stephen Bellefant
Defendant:
Cleophus Bray, Kathleen Leffingwell, Carla Gross and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Doe v. Murray et al
as 1:2023cv00275
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe
Defendant:
Lorenzo Ladale Murray, Brian Gramm, Edustaff, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00206
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 American Disability Act for Handicappers
Putman v. Tuscola, County of et al
as 1:2023cv10427
Plaintiff:
William E. Putman, II
Defendant:
Tuscola County, Correctional Healthcare Companies, LLC, Joseph Natole, M.D. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Menefee v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 4:2023cv10416
Plaintiff:
Rico Menefee
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Heidi Washington, M. Floyd and others
Baytops v. Harper et al
as 2:2023cv10339
Plaintiff:
Milton Baytops
Defendant:
Harper, Dana Nessell, Robyn B. Frankely and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv10280
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
