Cases 31 - 40 of 83
Jabir Bey v. Esposito, et al
as 20-1086
Defendant / Appellee:
Q, PROVIDENCE POLICE OFFICER BADGE #47, PRETE, Badge #522, SCACHELO, Badge #485 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LEONITUS JABIR BEY
Bey v. Esposito, et al
as 20-1041
Defendant / Appellee:
JOHN DOE, Badge #47, PROVIDENCE POLICE DEPARTMENT, SCACHELO, Badge #485 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMHAL TALIB ABDULLAH BEY
El Bey v. Esposito, et al
as 20-1043
Defendant / Appellee:
PRETE, Providence Police Officer Badge #522, PROVIDENCE POLICE DEPARTMENT, ELI, Providence Police Officer Badge #167 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
AHSAN EL BEY
El v. Esposito, et al
as 20-1044
Defendant / Appellee:
CHRIS, Providence Police Badge #206, CHRIS, Providence Police Badge #283, ROSS, Providence Police Badge #514 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAZIN EL
Park et al v. Song et al
as 1:2020cv00077
Defendant:
Aegis 42, LLC, Esther Choi, Aegis 233, LLC, and others
Plaintiff:
Eric Yu, Andrew Chang, Paul Lee and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Auguste v. Esposito, et al
as 19-2276
Defendant / Appellee:
PRETE, #522, DIAZ, #420, SCACHELO, #485 and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ELLE SOROR AUGUSTE
USD 233 Olathe v. JUUL Labs, Inc.
as 3:2019cv06910
Defendant:
JUUL Labs Inc
Plaintiff:
USD 233 Olathe
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
USD 233 Olathe v. JUUL Labs, Inc.
as 2:2019cv02608
Defendant:
JUUL Labs, Inc.
Plaintiff:
USD 233 Olathe
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Donahue v. Kansas Board of Education, et al
as 19-3180
Respondent / Appellee:
KANSAS BOARD OF EDUCATION, OLATHE SCHOOL DISTRICT USD #233, JOHN ALLISON, Superintendent and others
Petitioner / Appellant:
TONI R. DONAHUE and TONI R. DONAHUE, individually and on behalf of minor D. C. D.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv04440
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
