Cases 31 - 40 of 1,317
United States v. Jimenez-Hernandez
as 24-5060
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MACARIO JIMENEZ-HERNANDEZ, AKA Jose LNU, AKA FNU LNU, AKA Jose Ortiz-Lugo
Murdock v. Ingram et al
as 3:2024cv00473
Plaintiff:
Ajanaku Murdock
Defendant:
Kevin Ingram, FNU Williams and FNU LNU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crump v. (lnu) (1) et al
as 5:2024cv03063
Plaintiff:
Steven Crump
Defendant:
(fnu) (lnu) (1), (fnu) (lnu) (2), Johnson County, Kansas, Board of Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Crump v. Unified Government of Johnson County et al
as 5:2024cv03036
Plaintiff:
Steven Crump
Defendant:
Unified Government of Johnson County, Olathe, City of, Johnson County Board of Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez et al v. LNU et al
as 1:2024cv00440
Plaintiff:
Justin A. Hernandez, Carlos Mondragon, Javier Sanchez and others
Defendant:
FNU LNU, FNU Lucero, FNU Rosenbaucher and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Trevino v. Rowe et al
as 5:2024cv00088
Plaintiff:
Robert Trevino
Defendant:
Kelly S. Rowe and FNU LNU (5:24-CV-88)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joe v. LNU 3:24-CV-1071
as 3:2024cv01071
Plaintiff:
Demarcus Kenard Joe
Defendant:
FNU LNU 3:24-CV-1071
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Joe v. LNU 3:24-CV-1072
as 3:2024cv01072
Petitioner:
Demarcus Kenard Joe
Respondent:
FNU LNU 3:24-CV-1072
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cordova v. LNU 5:24-CV-079
as 5:2024cv00079
Plaintiff:
Isaiah Cordova
Defendant:
FNU LNU 5:24-CV-079
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Paulk v. Sessler et al
as 3:2024cv00431
Plaintiff:
Tiffany J Paulk
Defendant:
FNU Sessler and FNU LNU
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
