Cases 31 - 40 of 427,383
LANE v. VANATA et al
as 2:2024cv00864
Plaintiff:
DUSTIN LANE
Defendant:
BRIANNA C. VANATA, DAVID RUSSO and MATTHEW RUCINSKI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00988
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Carrera II v. Mason et al
as 3:2024cv00986
Petitioner:
Alfred C. Carrera II
Respondent:
Bernadette Mason and Pennsylvania Attorney General's Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
IN RE: MATTHEW ALWARD
as 3:2024cv00983
Plaintiff:
Matthew Alward
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Davis v. Crime Stoppers PA et al
as 1:2024cv00984
Plaintiff:
Rafiyq Davis
Defendant:
Crime Stoppers PA, Crime Watch PA, PA State Police and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Shannon v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00987
Plaintiff:
Steven Shannon
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Reid v. Tritt et al
as 1:2024cv00985
Plaintiff:
Arnez L. Reid
Defendant:
Isaac Tritt, Anthony Aquiler, Joseph N. Hogarth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
WHITEHEAD v. TICE et al
as 3:2024cv00083
Plaintiff:
CARL WHITEHEAD
Defendant:
FACILITY MANAGER ERIC TICE, Corrections Officer Machesky, CAPRIOTTI and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 cr Notice of Removal - Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02634
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sexual Harassment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv02528
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
