Cases 31 - 40 of 140,712
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00282
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrim
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00280
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Thompson v. O'Malley
as 2:2024cv00277
Plaintiff:
Shannon Depaul Thompson
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Neal v. O'Malley
as 3:2024cv00278
Plaintiff:
Richard Lee Neal, II
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
In Re: Aflibercept Patent Litigation
as 1:2024md03103
Not Yet Classified:
AFLIBERCEPT PATENT LITIGATION
Plaintiff:
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Defendant:
Mylan Pharmaceuticals, Inc., AMGEN USA, INC., BIOCON BIOLOGICS INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1338 Patent Infringement
Lawson v. City of St Albans, WV et al
as 2:2024cv00186
Plaintiff:
Reginald Craig Lawson
Defendant:
City of St. Albans, WV, Kanawah County, WV and State of West Virginia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Collins v. Amjad et al
as 5:2024cv00105
Plaintiff:
Clayton Steven Collins
Defendant:
Dr. Ayne Amjad, Dr. James Beane, Carla Deem and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Navarro v. United States of America
as 2:2024cv00009
Petitioner:
Cesar M. Navarro
Respondent:
United States of America
Green v. State of West Virginia et al
as 5:2024cv00073
Plaintiff:
Damion Dante Maurice Green
Defendant:
State of West Virginia, Brandi Otey, Raliegh County Parole Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Forbes v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv00194
Petitioner:
Dennis A. Forbes
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden, FCI McDowell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
