Cases 31 - 40 of 3,703
Contreras v. Macy's Retail Holdings, LLC et al
as 2:2024cv03009
Plaintiff:
Sandra Contreras
Defendant:
Macy's Retail Holdings, LLC and Blue Chip 2000 Commercial Cleaning Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00358
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Welch v. Contreras
as 9:2024cv01718
Plaintiff:
Croskeys Welch
Defendant:
Lilian Amador Contreras
Other:
Owners Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Welch v. Contreras
as 9:2024cv01719
Plaintiff:
Jeanne Welch
Defendant:
Lilian Amador Contreras
Other:
Owners Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Auto Negligence
Contreras v. Baysore et al
as 3:2024cv00189
Plaintiff:
Jose Antonio Martinez Contreras
Defendant:
Warden D. Baysore and FCI Yazoo City Medium
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Ramiro Contreras v. Bibb County CF Warden
as 24-10996
Petitioner:
RAMIRO DELREAL CONTRERAS
Respondent:
BIBB COUNTY CF WARDEN
Choudhury et al v. Contreras Transports LLC et al
as 1:2024cv02254
Plaintiff:
Abdus Choudhury, Rufia Choudhury and Nahim Choudhury
Defendant:
Contreras Transports LLC and Frankel Gerez-Santos
Cause Of Action: 23 U.S.C. § 1441 Contract Real Estate
Walker v. State of Arizona, et al.
as 24-1806
Plaintiff:
EMMANUEL WALKER, as Guardian of an incapacitated adult on behalf of Issac Contreras
Defendant:
STATE OF ARIZONA, AARON BOWEN, UNKNOWN BOWEN, husband and wife and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv02411
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00662
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
