Cases 31 - 40 of 45
Puentes v. County of Santa Clara et al
as 4:2011cv01228
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Puentes
Defendant:
County of Santa Clara , Michael Powers, Jim Tarshis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDaniel v. Chavez et al
as 1:2010cv01077
Plaintiff:
Robert McDaniel
Defendant:
Frank X Chavez, T.N. Davis, K. Loyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McDaniel v. Riedel et al
as 1:2009cv00437
Plaintiff:
Robert McDaniel
Defendant:
W. Riedel, T.N. Davis, K. Loyd and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Marilyn Orcutt et al v. The Garden City Group, Inc. et al
as 2:2009cv01449
Plaintiff:
Marilyn Orcutt, Marilyn Orcutt, Ryan Overstreet and others
Defendant:
The Garden City Group, Inc., The Garden City Group, Inc., The Garden City Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Robert Carson v. City of Fresno, et al
as 1:2008cv00468
Defendant:
City of Fresno, John Overstreet and Dave Uhruh
Plaintiff:
Robert Carson
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Knapp v. Tilton et al
as 3:2008cv00719
Plaintiff:
Eric Charles Rodney Knapp
Defendant:
James Tilton, Michael S. Evans, Arceo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Butler v. City of Sacramento
as 2:2007cv02406
Plaintiff:
James Edmiston, Russel Van Vuren, Michael A. Ferguson and others
Defendant:
City of Sacramento
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Moreno v. Sisto, et al
as 2:2007cv01500
Plaintiff:
Daniel R. Moreno
Defendant:
D. K. Sisto, A.W. Singh, Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Stally v. Sisto, et al
as 2:2007cv01498
Plaintiff:
Stally
Defendant:
D. K. Sisto, A.W. Singh, Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Poole v. Sisto, et al
as 2:2007cv01496
Plaintiff:
Darryl Poole
Defendant:
D. K. Sisto, A.W. Singh, Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
