Cases 31 - 40 of 246
Kim v. Cedar Realty Trust, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01103
Plaintiff:
Julia Kim
Defendant:
Cedar Realty Trust, Inc., Bruce J. Schanzer, Gregg A. Gonsalves and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Stockholders Suits
Blom et al v. City of Gadsden Alabama
as 4:2022cv00582
Plaintiff:
Matthew R Blom, Austin T Abernathy, Joseph C Bailey and others
Defendant:
City of Gadsden Alabama
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
Thornburgh v. Cedar Realty Trust, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02304
Plaintiff:
Anthony Thornburgh
Defendant:
Cedar Realty Trust, Inc., Bruce J. Schanzer, Abe Eisenstat and others
Thornburgh v. Cedar Realty Trust, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv02304
Plaintiff:
Anthony Thornburgh
Defendant:
Cedar Realty Trust, Inc., Bruce J. Schanzer, Abe Eisenstat and others
WATERMAN v. CEDAR REALTY TRUST, INC. et al
as 2:2022cv01489
Plaintiff:
MARC WATERMAN
Defendant:
CEDAR REALTY TRUST, INC., BRUCE J SCHANZER, GREGG A GONSALVES and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Whitfield v. Cedar Realty Trust, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv02204
Plaintiff:
Matthew Whitfield
Defendant:
Cedar Realty Trust, Inc., Bruce J. Schanzer, Gregg A. Gonsalves and others
Wang v. Cedar Realty Trust, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01975
Plaintiff:
Elaine Wang
Defendant:
Cedar Realty Trust, Inc., Bruce J. Schanzer, Gregg A. Gonsalves and others
Stein v. Cedar Realty Trust, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01944
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Defendant:
Cedar Realty Trust, Inc., Bruce J. Schanzer, Gregg A. Gonsalves and others
Stein v. Cedar Realty Trust, Inc. et al
as 2:2022cv01944
Plaintiff:
Shiva Stein
Defendant:
Cedar Realty Trust, Inc., Bruce J. Schanzer, Gregg A. Gonsalves and others
Levine v. Bradshaw et al
as 9:2022cv80321
Plaintiff:
Joshua Levine
Defendant:
Ric L. Bradshaw, D. Morris, K. Kinsey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 State Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
