Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 31 - 40 of 50
YOUNG v. FBI et al
as 1:2013cv01057
Defendant: FBI and UNITED STATES
Plaintiff: TIMOTHY DOYLE YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
YOUNG v. BERKEBILE
as 1:2013cv00912
Defendant: WARDEN BERKEBILE
Plaintiff: TIMOTHY DOYLE YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
AMERICAN PROFESSIONAL NURSING RESOURCES, LLC et al v. MEDICAL STAFFING WORLDWIDE LLC et al
as 3:2013cv00101
Plaintiff: AMERICAN PROFESSIONAL NURSING RESOURCES, LLC and DOYLE SILVERS
Defendant: JAMES GREG BOWERS, DAN HASSLINGER, JON MARLER and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2013cv00037
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
UWUA: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
BLACK v. VANDERBURGH COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE et al
as 3:2012cv00150
Plaintiff: PATRICK SCOTT BLACK
Defendant: JAMES DOYLE and VANDERBURGH COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01685
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
BLACK v. PIGMAN et al
as 3:2011cv00080
Plaintiff: PATRICK SCOTT BLACK
Defendant: SHAWN CHAPMAN, BEVERLY CORN, JAMES DOYLE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
YOUNG v. BUREAU OF PRISONS We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00734
Respondent: BUREAU OF PRISONS
Petitioner: TIMOTHY DOYLE YOUNG
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
IN RE: DOYLE
as 1:2011mc00032
IN RE: FAILURE TO SATISFY COSTS . . .
as 1:2011mc00028
Respondent: TIA R. BREWER, DARREN T. COLE, TIMOTHY A. DOYLE and others
In Re: FAILURE TO SATISFY COSTS IN LAWYER DISCIPLINARY CASES OF:

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?