Cases 31 - 40 of 51
Hardin v. Ruth et al
as 1:2012cv00030
Plaintiff:
Ray Mannings Hardin, Jr.
Defendant:
Jimmy Ruth and Gwen Beavers
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haveman et al v. SRM Lodging, LLC et al
as 1:2011cv00379
Plaintiff:
Theodore John Haveman and Misty Manning
Defendant:
SRM Lodging, LLC, Neil Patel and Shanabhai S Patel
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Manning v. United States of America
as 3:2011cv01014
Petitioner:
Antwan Marquis Manning
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv00663
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor_plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12131
Richardson v. Jones et al
as 2:2011cv02175
Plaintiff:
Erique Richardson
Defendant:
T. Jones, C. Turner, D. Manning and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Broadcast Music, Inc. et al v. M A K Holdings, Inc. et al
as 1:2010cv01265
Plaintiff:
Broadcast Music, Inc. , Bocephus Music, Inc. , MJ Publishing Trust and others
Defendant:
M A K Holdings, Inc. and Mohammed A. Khan
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00123
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Manning v. United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
as 1:2009cv00263
Plaintiff:
Linda Manning, Linda Manning and Linda Manning
Defendant:
United of Omaha Life Insurance Company and United of Omaha Life Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2009cv00040
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2009cv00007
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
