Cases 31 - 40 of 1,199
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00360
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal - Employment Discrimination
Elmore v. Does
as 4:2024cv00263
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Elmore
Defendant:
Does Employed by Arkansas Division of Correction, Benny Magness, John Felts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Childers v. Does et al
as 4:2024cv00264
Plaintiff:
Jeremiah Childers
Defendant:
Does Employed by Arkansas Division of Correction, Benny Magness, John Felts and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00377
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv00241
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Maget v. Richard et al
as 4:2024cv00208
Plaintiff:
Abbagayle Marie Maget and Kevin Lee Maget
Defendant:
Richard, Brush-Strode, Brown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. Ladner et al
as 3:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Rickey Brown
Defendant:
Cody Ladner, Taylor Igleheart and John Doe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. United Healthcare Corporation
as 6:2024cv06050
Plaintiff:
Janice Brown
Defendant:
United Healthcare Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Brown v. Otts et al
as 6:2024cv06017
Plaintiff:
Ce'drick D. Brown
Defendant:
Major Fredrick Otts, Sergeant B. Morgan and Corporal Shanlever
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Prinja v. Brown
as 2:2024cv02022
Plaintiff:
Melanie Ruth Prinja
Defendant:
Elmo Maurice Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
