Cases 31 - 40 of 2,141
Coleman v. Perhne et al
as 5:2024cv10624
Plaintiff:
Mark A. Coleman
Defendant:
Perhne, McCumber-Hemry and Nagy
Nirenberg v. Couzens, Lansky, Fealk, Roeder & Lazar, PC et al
as 2:2024cv10619
Plaintiff:
Henry Nirenberg
Defendant:
COUZENS, LANSKY, FEALK, ROEDER & LAZAR, P.C.,, Jack S Couzens, SADECKI & ASSOCIATES, P.L.L.C. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1104 Recovery of Benefits to Employee
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv10608
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv10596
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Comerica Bank v. Directors Mortgage, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv10605
Plaintiff:
Comerica Bank
Defendant:
Directors Mortgage, Inc., Mark J. Hannah and Mark J. Hanna
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Injunctive & Declaratory Relief
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv10565
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Dobronski v. Labovick & Labovick, P.A.
as 4:2024cv10561
Plaintiff:
Mark W. Dobronski
Defendant:
Labovick & Labovick, P.A. Doing business as Labovick Law Group
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
Thomas #684159 v. Jurva et al
as 2:2024cv00035
Plaintiff:
Romero Monte Thomas #684159
Defendant:
Leland Jurva, Mark Skytta, Nicholas Lanctot and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Heath v. Cole et al
as 1:2024cv10568
Plaintiff:
Mark Andrew Heath and Mark Andrew Heath [E-filer]
Defendant:
Gary Charles Cole, Jr., Adrian Anderson and Oscoda, County of
White v. Washington et al
as 2:2024cv10550
Plaintiff:
Mark White
Defendant:
Heidi Washington, MDOC, Smith and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
