Cases 31 - 40 of 41
Robinson v. Saffo et al
as 5:2010cv06029
Plaintiff:
Clyde Robinson
Defendant:
Karl Saffo, Brenda Shira, Jean Ann Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cregg Matthews v. Dr. Karl Saffo, et al
as 10-1582
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Cregg L. Matthews
Defendant:
MO Dept. of Corrections, Western Missouri Correctional Center, CMS Medical Service and others
Defendant - Appellee:
Dr. Karl Saffo and Joy Hailey
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv03053
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Type:
Other Statutes
Clara Saffo v. A.r. Wilfley & Sons, et al.
as PAE/2:09-CV-76724
Defendant:
A.r. Wilfley & Sons
Plaintiff:
Clara Saffo
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02194
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Type:
Other Statutes
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02193
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Type:
Other Statutes
SAFFO v. A.R. WILFLEY & SONS et al
as 2:2009cv76724
Plaintiff:
CLARA SAFFO
Defendant:
A.R. WILFLEY & SONS, ACF VALVES, A.W. CHESTERTON and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Jones v. Finnerman et al
as 1:2009cv03916
Plaintiff:
Timothy Jones
Defendant:
Adrian Finnerman, Pinckneyville Correctional Center, Cullinun and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
John Saffo v. A.r. Wilfley & Sons, et al.
as PAE/2:08-CV-84887
Defendant:
A.r. Wilfley & Sons
Plaintiff:
John Saffo
Smith v. Correctional Medical Services et al
as 5:2007cv06134
Plaintiff:
Harold Duane Smith
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Services, Joey Haley and Karl Saffo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
