Cases 31 - 40 of 259
Ward v. United States of America
as 2:2022cv02867
Petitioner:
Jason Mitchell Ward
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ward v. Stanley et al
as 2:2022cv00155
Plaintiff:
Herbert B Ward
Defendant:
Deputy - Stanley, Jeff Cassidy, Sullivan County Sheriff Office and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ward v. Frink
as 1:2022cv01257
Petitioner:
Randall Ward
Respondent:
Martin Frink
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chism v. Oakes et al
as 3:2022cv00367
Plaintiff:
Melvin Chism, III
Defendant:
Ricky Oakes, Jeff Coffey, Shelly Mannis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Coleman-Ward v. Bowden et al
as 1:2022cv01211
Plaintiff:
Ronald Coleman-Ward
Defendant:
Randall Bowden and Kevin Wagler
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Ward et al v. Ervin
as 3:2022cv00766
Plaintiff:
Justin Ward and Encore Luxury Coaches, LLC
Defendant:
Kylee Ervin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Brown v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2022cv00754
Plaintiff:
H.C. Brown, Jr.
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Tony Mays, Micheal Keys and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv02634
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Ward et al v. Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Association
as 2:2022cv02626
Not Classified By Court:
Clerk W. Aaron Hall
Plaintiff:
William Ward and Jerrold Irvin
Defendant:
Tennessee Secondary School Athletic Association
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ward v. State of Tenn.
as 2:2022cv02616
Petitioner:
Bryant Ward and Bryant E. Ward
Respondent:
State of Tenn.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
