Cases 31 - 40 of 574
Verghese et al v. ASM America Incorporated
as 2:2022cv01762
Plaintiff:
Mohith Verghese and Carl White
Consolidated Plaintiff:
ASM America Incorporated
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Hillstone Restaurant Group Incorporated v. White Boy Racing LLC et al
as 2:2022cv01646
Plaintiff:
Hillstone Restaurant Group Incorporated
Defendant:
White Boy Racing LLC, Lindsay White and Tristan White
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Trademark Infringement (Lanham Act)
White #285429 v. Covarrubias
as 2:2022cv01488
Plaintiff:
Tyrel White
Defendant:
Unknown Covarrubias
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parker v. Blinken et al
as 2:2022cv01394
Plaintiff:
Jamal Darius Parker and Jamal El Trust
Defendant:
Anthony Blinken, Debra Anne Haaland, Merrick Garland and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Kreus #058309 v. Shinn et al
as 2:2022cv01273
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lynn Kreus
Defendant:
David Shinn, Unknown Perro, P Barr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
White v. Commissioner of Social Security Administration
as 3:2022cv08113
Plaintiff:
Matthew White
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Tutt v. Menlove et al
as 2:2022cv00890
Plaintiff:
Roderick Citron Tutt
Defendant:
James Menlove, J Adam Shepherd, Unknown Party and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv08087
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Meraz v. Nelson et al
as 2:2022cv00728
Plaintiff:
Alex Meraz
Defendant:
Roger A Nelson, Mary E White, David Shinn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
