Cases 31 - 40 of 134
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00065
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Aldridge et al v. Mississippi Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2019cv00868
Plaintiff:
James Cole, Daphne Tyler, Laverne Boone and others
Defendant:
Mississippi Department of Corrections, Jacqueline Thompson, Pelicia Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2019cv00193
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Anderson v. Sollie et al
as 3:2020cv00675
Defendant:
Mjr Mellissa McCarter, Sheriff Billy Sollie and Lt. Latoya Bennett
Plaintiff:
Chentashiana J. Anderson
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terrell v. Sollie et al
as 3:2020cv00630
Plaintiff:
Mario Lewon Terrell
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Defendant:
Latoya Bennett, Anthony Demarcus Atterberry and Billie Sollie
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Terrell v. Sollie et al
as 3:2020cv00492
Defendant:
Anthony Atterberry, Latoya Bennett, Billie Sollie and others
Plaintiff:
Mario Lewon Terrell
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Driver v. Davis et al
as 3:2020cv00123
Defendant:
Brian L. Davis, Davis Law Firm, PLLC and Ervin R. Bennett
Plaintiff:
Dennis E. Driver
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00371
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bennett v. Hall et al
as 4:2020cv00026
Defendant:
Timothy Morris, Marshal Turner, Lee Simon and others
Plaintiff:
Devin Bennett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Bennett v. King
as 3:2020cv00229
Defendant:
Ronald King
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Petitioner:
Joseph Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
