Cases 31 - 40 of 175
Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland v. Lakota Contracting Inc d/b/a NCF Interiors et al
as 3:2020cv00046
Defendant:
John Boyle, Hossein Amirghaffari, National Commercial Flooring Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Devabhaktuni v. Rutherford et al
as 3:2019cv02959
Defendant:
Ed Kinkeade, Rebecca Rutherford, Ada Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Manogna Devabhaktuni
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Devabhaktuni v. Rutherford et al
as 3:2019cv02958
Defendant:
Ed Kinkeade, Rebecca Rutherford, Ada Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Manogna Devabhaktuni
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Devabhaktuni v. Godbey et al
as 3:2019cv02963
Defendant:
Irma Carri, Rebecca Rutherford, Ada Brown and others
Plaintiff:
Manogna Devabhaktuni
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2019cv00812
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Devabhaktuni v. Ravi et al
as 3:2019cv02710
Defendant:
Ed Kinkeade, NQS, Rebecca Rutherford and others
Plaintiff:
Manogna Devabhaktuni
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Devabhaktuni v. Boyle et al
as 3:2019cv02636
Defendant:
A Joe Fish, Custom Border Patrol and James Boyle
Plaintiff:
Manogna Devabhaktuni
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981
Sawyer v. Boyles et al
as 7:2019cv00061
Defendant:
Joseph C Boyles and Jason Scholl
Plaintiff:
Thomas Sawyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Boyle v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration
as 2:2019cv00103
Plaintiff:
Danielle R Boyle
Defendant:
Commissioner, Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416
Acevedo et al v. FCA US LLC et al
as 3:2019cv00091
Plaintiff:
Gary Domstead, Robert Hunt, Paul Playfair and others
Defendant:
VM North America Inc, FCA US LLC, Fiat Chrysler Automobiles NV and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
