Cases 31 - 40 of 539
Clark v. City of Greenville, North Carolina et al
as 4:2023cv00186
Plaintiff:
Kelsey Clark
Defendant:
City of Greenville, North Carolina, Nicholas Carnevale, Fred Gorham, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Clarke v. USA
as 4:2023cv00179
Petitioner:
Nigel Clarke
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
McElroy et al v. AT&T Corp. et al
as 5:2021cv00179
Defendant:
Estee Lauder, Inc., AT&T Corp., Specialty Minerals, Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Stephen McElroy and Patricia McElroy
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00652
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Clark v. United States of America
as 7:2023cv01378
Plaintiff:
Kathy Leonor Clark
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Williams v. Clark et al
as 5:2023hc02181
Petitioner:
Charles A. Williams
Respondent:
Officer Clark and DHO Dexter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lowery-Clark v. Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
as 3:2023cv00437
Plaintiff:
Tammy Lowery-Clark
Defendant:
Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 635 Breach of Insurance Contract
Estes v. Mayo
as 5:2023ct03221
Plaintiff:
Gloria Hughes Estes
Defendant:
Beverly Clark Mayo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meza-Rodriguez v. Evans et al
as 5:2023ct03240
Plaintiff:
Miguel Antonio Meza-Rodriguez
Defendant:
Charlotte Evans, Nurse Pierre, Mashell Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clarke v. Merck & Co., Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv00508
Plaintiff:
Chase A. Clarke
Defendant:
Merck & Co., Inc. and Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
