Cases 31 - 40 of 141
Florida Handling Systems, Inc. v. Ashfield, et al.
as 1:2019cv01177
Defendant:
Thomas Ashfield and Hoist & Crane Service Group, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Florida Handling Systems, Inc.
Crane v. AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, LP et al
as 1:2019cv00523
Defendant:
Merck Sharp & Dohme, Takeda Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Takeda Development Center Americas Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Sandra Crane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Martinez v. Purdue Pharma Inc. et al
as 1:2019op45353
Defendant:
Richard Sackler, Theresa Sackler, Ronald F. McBride and others
Plaintiff:
Jorge A. Martinez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2019cv00048
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Zelesnik v. NASA et al
as 2:2018cv01225
Defendant:
District 12 ODOT, Cincinnati Vineyard Church, The State Of Ohio and others
Plaintiff:
Paula Zelesnik
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv00597
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
American Power, LLC v. Harris et al
as 3:2017cv00347
Plaintiff:
American Power, LLC
Defendant:
Douglas O. Harris, Murray J. Crane, Michael T. Morley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Maxim Crane Works, L.P. v. Mitchell Piping, LLC
as 5:2017cv01720
Plaintiff:
Maxim Crane Works, L.P.
Defendant:
Mitchell Piping, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Crane v. United States of America
as 4:2017cv00695
Petitioner:
Donald Crane
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Konecranes, Inc. et al v. Hoist & Crane Service Group, Inc. et al
as 3:2017cv00064
Plaintiff:
Konecranes, Inc. and Terex Utilities, Inc.
Defendant:
Hoist & Crane Service Group, Inc. , David E Backhaus , Michael Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
